Employment Appeal Tribunal judgement regarding s111A ERA 1996 in Harrison v Aryma Limited

James Bromige successfully represented the Appellant before the EAT in a decision concerning the Tribunal’s approach to section 111A ERA 1996 (protected conversations) where there are multiple causes of action which might impact upon sub-sections (3) and (4), of s111A.  The judgment also reminds both lawyers and Judges of the need to pro-actively seek clarification of the issues before a hearing to ensure that all matters in dispute are properly aired and considered.

James was instructed by Alasdair Hobbs of Excello Law.

To read the full judgment click here.